Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

App-Store-Builder vs Apper MCP Connector

App-Store-Builder is an MCP server published by Evozim. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Apper MCP Connector is an MCP server published by apperhq. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-18. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceApp-Store-BuilderApper MCP Connector
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

App-Store-Builder vs Apper MCP Connector
FactApp-Store-BuilderApper MCP Connector
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (app-store-builder-mcp.vercel.app/api/mcp)Remote server (mcp.apper.io/v1/connect)
Transport (differs)SSEStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/apperhq/mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Answered with HTTP 402 (5 days ago)Responded 18 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

App-Store-Builder

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Extension bundler packaging plugins for AI agent ecosystems.

Apper MCP Connector

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Build and update complete applications in Apper through AI assistants using MCP.

How to run each

App-Store-Builder As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport sse app-store-builder https://app-store-builder-mcp.vercel.app/api/mcp --header "payment-signature: <YOUR_PAYMENT_SIGNATURE>"

Requires: payment-signature header

Apper MCP Connector As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http apper-mcp https://mcp.apper.io/v1/connect

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only the endpoint of Apper MCP Connector responded at the last daily check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: App-Store-Builder · What it can do: Apper MCP Connector · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built