Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Execute chiller-cop-efficiency-mcp vs io.github.ezumba/exergynet

Execute chiller-cop-efficiency-mcp is an MCP server published by Evozim. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). io.github.ezumba/exergynet is an MCP server published by ezumba. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-07. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceExecute chiller-cop-efficiency-mcpio.github.ezumba/exergynet
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 2.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.2.6
Downloads/month (npm): 183
Downloads/week (npm): 77
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Execute chiller-cop-efficiency-mcp vs io.github.ezumba/exergynet
FactExecute chiller-cop-efficiency-mcpio.github.ezumba/exergynet
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (api.m2mcent.com/chiller-cop-efficiency-mcp/sse)On your machine (exergynet-mcp-server)
Transport (differs)SSEstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published1, secrets among them: 0
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/ezumba/exergynet-mcp-server
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Status out of date: last check 2 days ago returned HTTP 402no remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Execute chiller-cop-efficiency-mcp

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Premium agentic endpoint for chiller-cop-efficiency-mcp.

io.github.ezumba/exergynet

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Read-only ExergyNet MCP lookups and compute-cost estimates; write settlement is disabled.

How to run each

Execute chiller-cop-efficiency-mcp As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport sse chiller-cop-efficiency-mcp https://api.m2mcent.com/chiller-cop-efficiency-mcp/sse --header "Payment-Signature: <YOUR_PAYMENT_SIGNATURE>"

Requires: Payment-Signature header

io.github.ezumba/exergynet As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio exergynet -- npx -y exergynet-mcp-server

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Execute chiller-cop-efficiency-mcp has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Execute chiller-cop-efficiency-mcp publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Execute chiller-cop-efficiency-mcp · What it can do: io.github.ezumba/exergynet · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built