Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

GhostBlock vs defluff

GhostBlock is an MCP server published by Evozim. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). defluff is an MCP server published by ahmedak. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-21. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceGhostBlockdefluff
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.2
Downloads/month (PyPI): 101
Downloads/week (PyPI): 36
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

GhostBlock vs defluff
FactGhostBlockdefluff
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub2
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub1
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (ghostblock-mcp.vercel.app/api/mcp)On your machine (defluff)
Transport (differs)SSEstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/ahmedak/defluff
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Answered with HTTP 402 (5 days ago)no remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

GhostBlock

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

AI writing style detector scoring original versus generated text.

defluff

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Deterministic prose linter for LLM text — flags AI slop, filler, buzzwords, hedges, clichés.

How to run each

GhostBlock As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport sse ghostblock https://ghostblock-mcp.vercel.app/api/mcp --header "payment-signature: <YOUR_PAYMENT_SIGNATURE>"

Requires: payment-signature header

defluff As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio defluff -- uvx --from "defluff[mcp]" defluff defluff-mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only GhostBlock has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: GhostBlock · What it can do: defluff · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built