Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Hyperiux Vault vs affectUI

Hyperiux Vault is an MCP server published by Hyperiux-Immersion-Labs. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). affectUI is an MCP server published by flohoeller. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-26. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceHyperiux VaultaffectUI
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.3.0
Downloads/month (npm): 535
Downloads/week (npm): 41
Forks (GitHub): 7
Stars (GitHub): 102
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 6
Stars (GitHub): 251
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Hyperiux Vault vs affectUI
FactHyperiux VaultaffectUI
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)102 (worse)251 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)7 (better)6 (worse)
Last release (differs)2026-10-19Not published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (hyperiux-mcp-server)Remote server (www.affectui.com/api/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/hyperiux-immersion-labs/hyperiux-componentsgithub.com/flohoeller/affectui
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)10
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 5 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Hyperiux Vault

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Browse, inspect, and retrieve installable React and Next.js interaction effects from Hyperiux Vault.

affectUI

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Search, read and install agent-ready React components, screens and blocks for AI products.

How to run each

Hyperiux Vault As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio hyperiux-mcp-server -- npx -y hyperiux-mcp-server

affectUI As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http affectui https://www.affectui.com/api/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only affectUI has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Hyperiux Vault · What it can do: affectUI · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built