Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Agent Guardrail MCP Server vs RecourseOS

Agent Guardrail MCP Server is an MCP server published by JarvisOnM4. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). RecourseOS is an MCP server published by recourseOS. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-18. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceAgent Guardrail MCP ServerRecourseOS
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.1.2
Downloads/month (PyPI): 127
Downloads/week (PyPI): 33
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.12
Downloads/month (npm): 678
Downloads/week (npm): 60
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Agent Guardrail MCP Server vs RecourseOS
FactAgent Guardrail MCP ServerRecourseOS
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)1No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (agent-guardrail)On your machine (recourse-cli)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/eren-solutions/agent-guardrailgithub.com/recourseos/recourse
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Agent Guardrail MCP Server

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Action-level governance for AI agents -- control what they DO, not what they SAY

RecourseOS

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Consequence evaluation for AI agents. Check recoverability before destructive actions.

How to run each

Agent Guardrail MCP Server As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio agent-guardrail -- uvx agent-guardrail

RecourseOS As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio recourse -- npx -y recourse-cli

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Agent Guardrail MCP Server · What it can do: RecourseOS · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built