KrystalView Analytics vs Pulse
KrystalView Analytics is an MCP server published by KrystalView. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Pulse is an MCP server published by pulsecircle.studio. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-24. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  KrystalView Analytics |  Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Official MCP Registry | Listed Version: 0.1.6 Downloads/month (PyPI): 252 Downloads/week (PyPI): 36 Forks (GitHub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 0 Not marked · First seen |
Listed Version: 0.1.2 Downloads/month (npm): 155 Downloads/week (npm): 27 Forks (GitHub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 0 Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | KrystalView Analytics | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it | 1 | 1 |
| Stars (GitHub) | 0 | 0 |
| Forks (GitHub) | 0 | 0 |
| Last release | Not published | Not published |
| Where it runs (differs) | Remote server or your machine | Remote server (mcp.pulse.pulsecircle.studio/mcp) |
| Transport (differs) | Streamable HTTP, stdio | Streamable HTTP |
| Tools it declares | Not published | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for (differs) | 2, secrets among them: 1 | Not published |
| Licence | Not stated | Not stated |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/krystalview/krystalview-mcp | github.com/pulse-circle-studio/pulse-sdk |
| Changes in the last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First seen | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-11 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | Responded 5 days ago | Not responding since 2026-10-24 |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
KrystalView Analytics
Read-only MCP access to sessions, funnels, campaigns, errors, live visitors, and anomalies.
Pulse
Ask about revenue, MRR, ad spend, LTV and CAC; install the Pulse SDK. Read-only.
How to run each
KrystalView Analytics As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http krystalview https://krystalview.com/mcpRequires: KRYSTALVIEW_API_KEY (secret)
Pulse As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http pulse https://mcp.pulse.pulsecircle.studio/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"Requires: Authorization header
Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Only the endpoint of KrystalView Analytics responded at the last daily check. How we check endpoints
Tools each declares
Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.
Settings each asks for
The marketplaces of Pulse publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.
What it can do: KrystalView Analytics · What it can do: Pulse · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.