Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

io.github.MUSE-CODE-SPACE/vibe-coding vs io.github.erova/vibesharing

io.github.MUSE-CODE-SPACE/vibe-coding is an MCP server published by MUSE-CODE-SPACE. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). io.github.erova/vibesharing is an MCP server published by erova. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-18. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceio.github.MUSE-CODE-SPACE/vibe-codingio.github.erova/vibesharing
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 2.12.1
Downloads/month (npm): 256
Downloads/week (npm): 48
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.17.0
Downloads/month (npm): 346
Downloads/week (npm): 57
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

io.github.MUSE-CODE-SPACE/vibe-coding vs io.github.erova/vibesharing
Factio.github.MUSE-CODE-SPACE/vibe-codingio.github.erova/vibesharing
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)1 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (vibe-coding-mcp)On your machine (@vibesharingapp/mcp-server)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published1, secrets among them: 1
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/muse-code-space/vibe-coding-mcpgithub.com/erova/vibesharing-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

io.github.MUSE-CODE-SPACE/vibe-coding

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Auto-document vibe coding sessions - collect, summarize, and publish

io.github.erova/vibesharing

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Deploy prototypes and collect team feedback from Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP client.

How to run each

io.github.MUSE-CODE-SPACE/vibe-coding As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio vibe-coding -- npx -y vibe-coding-mcp

io.github.erova/vibesharing As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "VIBESHARING_TOKEN=<YOUR_VIBESHARING_TOKEN>" --transport stdio vibesharing -- npx -y @vibesharingapp/mcp-server

Requires: VIBESHARING_TOKEN (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of io.github.MUSE-CODE-SPACE/vibe-coding publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: io.github.MUSE-CODE-SPACE/vibe-coding · What it can do: io.github.erova/vibesharing · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built