Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

io.github.MetaLift-AI/metalift vs tech.geckovision/surf

io.github.MetaLift-AI/metalift is an MCP server published by MetaLift-AI. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). tech.geckovision/surf is an MCP server published by geckovision.tech. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-23. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceio.github.MetaLift-AI/metalifttech.geckovision/surf
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.0.15
Downloads/month (npm): 817
Downloads/week (npm): 78
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.2.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 397
Downloads/week (PyPI): 214
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 21
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

io.github.MetaLift-AI/metalift vs tech.geckovision/surf
Factio.github.MetaLift-AI/metalifttech.geckovision/surf
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)21 (better)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (@metalift/mcp)Remote server (mcp.geckovision.tech/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 1Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/metalift-ai/metalift-mcpgithub.com/geckovision/gecko-surf
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 32 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

io.github.MetaLift-AI/metalift

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Metalift MCP for AI agents: web search (2 credits), scrape, crawl, and map tools

tech.geckovision/surf

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Point Gecko at an OpenAPI spec; get first-call-correct, auth-hidden agent tools.

How to run each

io.github.MetaLift-AI/metalift As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "METALIFT_API_KEY=<YOUR_METALIFT_API_KEY>" --env "METALIFT_API_URL=<YOUR_METALIFT_API_URL>" --transport stdio metalift -- npx -y @metalift/mcp

Requires: METALIFT_API_KEY (secret), METALIFT_API_URL

tech.geckovision/surf As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http surf https://mcp.geckovision.tech/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only tech.geckovision/surf has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of tech.geckovision/surf publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: io.github.MetaLift-AI/metalift · What it can do: tech.geckovision/surf · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built