Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

LeakRank Guard vs GitHub Actions Audit

LeakRank Guard is an MCP server published by ProtoTeemo. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). GitHub Actions Audit is an MCP server published by UnbearableDev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-22. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceLeakRank GuardGitHub Actions Audit
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.2.3
Downloads/month (npm): 172
Downloads/week (npm): 17
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.1
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

LeakRank Guard vs GitHub Actions Audit
FactLeakRank GuardGitHub Actions Audit
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (leakrank-guard)Remote server (unbearable-dev--github-actions-audit.apify.actor/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 1Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/unbearabledev/github-actions-audit
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 30 h ago, requires a key

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

LeakRank Guard

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Scans code changes for leaked secrets and insecure config, with actionable fixes for AI agents.

GitHub Actions Audit

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

GitHub Actions workflow security audit - 21 checks: pinning, permissions, secrets, injection.

How to run each

LeakRank Guard As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "LEAKRANK_API_KEY=<YOUR_LEAKRANK_API_KEY>" --transport stdio leakrank-guard -- npx -y leakrank-guard mcp

Requires: LEAKRANK_API_KEY (secret)

GitHub Actions Audit As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http github-actions-audit https://unbearable-dev--github-actions-audit.apify.actor/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only GitHub Actions Audit has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of GitHub Actions Audit publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: LeakRank Guard · What it can do: GitHub Actions Audit · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built