Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Polar Health Data (self-hosted) vs ghurt

Polar Health Data (self-hosted) is an MCP server published by StuMason. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). ghurt is an MCP server published by ghurt.org. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-04. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplacePolar Health Data (self-hosted)ghurt
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.6.2
Forks (GitHub): 5
Stars (GitHub): 25
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Polar Health Data (self-hosted) vs ghurt
FactPolar Health Data (self-hosted)ghurt
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)25No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)5No figure on GitHub
Last release (differs)2026-10-19Not published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (docker.io/stumason/polar-flow-server:1.6.2)Remote server (ghurt.org/v1/mcp)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)4, secrets among them: 2Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/stumason/polar-flow-serverNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 4 days ago, requires a key

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Polar Health Data (self-hosted)

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Self-hosted Polar health analytics with a built-in MCP server: sleep, HRV, workouts, baselines.

ghurt

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Query Garmin, Oura & Whoop sleep, HRV, recovery & training load from Claude or ChatGPT.

How to run each

Polar Health Data (self-hosted)

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Requires: DATABASE_URL (secret), POLAR_CLIENT_ID, POLAR_CLIENT_SECRET (secret)

ghurt

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only ghurt has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of ghurt publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Polar Health Data (self-hosted) · What it can do: ghurt · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built