Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

web-retrieval-mcp vs CrawlEyes MCP Server

web-retrieval-mcp is an MCP server published by VelvetSP. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). CrawlEyes MCP Server is an MCP server published by waiky-github. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-18. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceweb-retrieval-mcpCrawlEyes MCP Server
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.1.2
Downloads/month (PyPI): 85
Downloads/week (PyPI): 17
Forks (GitHub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.2.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 126
Downloads/week (PyPI): 34
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

web-retrieval-mcp vs CrawlEyes MCP Server
Factweb-retrieval-mcpCrawlEyes MCP Server
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub)22
Forks (GitHub) (differs)2 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (web-retrieval-mcp)On your machine (crawleyes)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 22, secrets among them: 1
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/velvetsp/web-retrieval-mcpgithub.com/waiky-github/crawleyes
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

web-retrieval-mcp

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

MCP web search + tiered web fetch for AI agents (Exa, Firecrawl), SSRF-guarded, cross-platform.

CrawlEyes MCP Server

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Web scraping & search for AI agents: extract, SearXNG search, rerank, robots compliance. No API key.

How to run each

web-retrieval-mcp As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "EXA_API_KEY=<YOUR_EXA_API_KEY>" --env "FIRECRAWL_API_KEY=<YOUR_FIRECRAWL_API_KEY>" --transport stdio web-retrieval-mcp -- uvx web-retrieval-mcp

Requires: EXA_API_KEY (secret), FIRECRAWL_API_KEY (secret)

CrawlEyes MCP Server As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "TAVILY_API_KEY=<YOUR_TAVILY_API_KEY>" --transport stdio crawleyes -- uvx crawleyes

Requires: TAVILY_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only web-retrieval-mcp asks for

  • EXA_API_KEY (secret)
  • FIRECRAWL_API_KEY (secret)

Only CrawlEyes MCP Server asks for

  • SEARXNG_URL
  • TAVILY_API_KEY (secret)

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: web-retrieval-mcp · What it can do: CrawlEyes MCP Server · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built