Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

ProjectPulse MCP vs GitLumen MCP

ProjectPulse MCP is an MCP server published by alexbypa. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). GitLumen MCP is an MCP server published by gitlumen-team. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-18. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceProjectPulse MCPGitLumen MCP
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.10.0
Downloads/month (npm): 1 288
Downloads/week (npm): 117
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

ProjectPulse MCP vs GitLumen MCP
FactProjectPulse MCPGitLumen MCP
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)1 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last release (differs)2026-10-18Not published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (projectpulse-mcp)Remote server (mcp-github-screen.gitlumen.com/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 1Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/alexbypa/github-projectpulse-mcpgithub.com/gitlumen-team/gitlumen-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)20
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkNot responding since 2026-10-13

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

ProjectPulse MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Monitor GitHub repo health, DORA metrics and CI signals from your AI assistant.

GitLumen MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Screens public GitHub repos and PRs to generate risk maps, findings, and merge-readiness signals.

How to run each

ProjectPulse MCP As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "GITHUB_TOKEN=<YOUR_GITHUB_TOKEN>" --transport stdio github-projectpulse-mcp -- npx -y projectpulse-mcp

Requires: GITHUB_TOKEN (secret)

GitLumen MCP As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http gitlumen-mcp https://mcp-github-screen.gitlumen.com/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only GitLumen MCP has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of GitLumen MCP publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: ProjectPulse MCP · What it can do: GitLumen MCP · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built