Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

io.github.apexapi/apexapi-mcp vs OpenRouter

io.github.apexapi/apexapi-mcp is an MCP server published by apexapi. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). OpenRouter is an MCP server published by tsilva. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-22. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceio.github.apexapi/apexapi-mcpOpenRouter
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.1.1
Downloads/month (npm): 651
Downloads/week (npm): 40
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.1.8
Downloads/month (PyPI): 189
Downloads/week (PyPI): 98
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

io.github.apexapi/apexapi-mcp vs OpenRouter
Factio.github.apexapi/apexapi-mcpOpenRouter
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)1 (better)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (apexapi-mcp)On your machine (mcp-openrouter)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 16, secrets among them: 1
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/apexapi/apexapi-mcpgithub.com/tsilva/mcp-openrouter
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

io.github.apexapi/apexapi-mcp

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Call 120+ AI models and live web context (scrape/crawl/extract) from any MCP client with one key

OpenRouter

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

MCP server providing access to 300+ AI models via OpenRouter

How to run each

io.github.apexapi/apexapi-mcp As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "APEXAPI_API_KEY=<YOUR_APEXAPI_API_KEY>" --transport stdio apexapi-mcp -- npx -y apexapi-mcp

Requires: APEXAPI_API_KEY (secret)

OpenRouter As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "OPENROUTER_API_KEY=<YOUR_OPENROUTER_API_KEY>" --transport stdio mcp-openrouter -- uvx mcp-openrouter

Requires: OPENROUTER_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only io.github.apexapi/apexapi-mcp asks for

  • APEXAPI_API_KEY (secret)

Only OpenRouter asks for

  • DEFAULT_CODE_MODEL
  • DEFAULT_EMBEDDING_MODEL
  • DEFAULT_IMAGE_MODEL
  • DEFAULT_TEXT_MODEL
  • DEFAULT_VISION_MODEL
  • OPENROUTER_API_KEY (secret)

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: io.github.apexapi/apexapi-mcp · What it can do: OpenRouter · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built