Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

memory-boost vs Tribal

memory-boost is an MCP server published by arnaugonzalez. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Tribal is an MCP server published by tribal-memory. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-19. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacememory-boostTribal
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.2.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 276
Downloads/week (PyPI): 34
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.4.1
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 10
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

memory-boost vs Tribal
Factmemory-boostTribal
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)10 (better)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last release (differs)2026-10-18Not published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (memory-boost)On your machine (ghcr.io/tribal-memory/tribal:0.4.1)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published8, secrets among them: 2
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/arnaugonzalez/memory-boostgithub.com/tribal-memory/tribal
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)50
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

memory-boost

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Markdown memory for coding agents that audits itself: drift reports and session digests.

Tribal

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Self-hosted semantic memory over MCP for an engineering team's tacit knowledge. Needs Postgres.

How to run each

memory-boost As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio memory-boost -- uvx memory-boost serve

Tribal

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Requires: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (secret), OPENAI_API_KEY (secret), TRIBAL_DATABASE__URL, TRIBAL_PROJECT_NAME, TRIBAL_PROJECT_REMOTE

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of memory-boost publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: memory-boost · What it can do: Tribal · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built