Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

BEACON Commons vs science.executable/executable-science

BEACON Commons is an MCP server published by babakovn. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). science.executable/executable-science is an MCP server published by executable.science. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-14. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceBEACON Commonsscience.executable/executable-science
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.0.1
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.2.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

BEACON Commons vs science.executable/executable-science
FactBEACON Commonsscience.executable/executable-science
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (commons.beacon.methodfield.com/commons/mcp)Remote server (executable.science/api/mcp)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/babakovn/beacon-agent-clientsNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Not responding since 2026-10-13not checked yet

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

BEACON Commons

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Discover tasks and reproducible results. Public reading; invited, host-approved contributions.

science.executable/executable-science

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Read-only research pilot catalogue: task templates, resources, starter studies, capability status.

How to run each

BEACON Commons As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http beacon-commons https://commons.beacon.methodfield.com/commons/mcp

science.executable/executable-science As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http executable-science https://executable.science/api/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only BEACON Commons has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: BEACON Commons · What it can do: science.executable/executable-science · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built