Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

io.github.bajoski34/mcp-flutterwave vs io.github.codespar/mcp-stone

io.github.bajoski34/mcp-flutterwave is an MCP server published by bajoski34. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). io.github.codespar/mcp-stone is an MCP server published by codespar. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-18. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceio.github.bajoski34/mcp-flutterwaveio.github.codespar/mcp-stone
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.2.0
Downloads/month (npm): 1 220
Downloads/week (npm): 294
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 4
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.2.2
Downloads/month (npm): 296
Downloads/week (npm): 37
Forks (GitHub): 51
Stars (GitHub): 273
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

io.github.bajoski34/mcp-flutterwave vs io.github.codespar/mcp-stone
Factio.github.bajoski34/mcp-flutterwaveio.github.codespar/mcp-stone
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)4 (worse)273 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)51 (better)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp-flutterwave)On your machine (@codespar/mcp-stone)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for1, secrets among them: 11, secrets among them: 1
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/bajoski34/mcp-flutterwavegithub.com/codespar/mcp-dev-latam
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

io.github.bajoski34/mcp-flutterwave

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

MCP Server to interact with Flutterwave APIs.

io.github.codespar/mcp-stone

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

MCP server for Stone — open banking, payments, Pix, transfers

How to run each

io.github.bajoski34/mcp-flutterwave As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "FLW_SECRET_KEY=<YOUR_FLW_SECRET_KEY>" --transport stdio mcp-flutterwave -- npx -y mcp-flutterwave

Requires: FLW_SECRET_KEY (secret)

io.github.codespar/mcp-stone As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "STONE_CLIENT_SECRET=<YOUR_STONE_CLIENT_SECRET>" --transport stdio mcp-stone -- npx -y @codespar/mcp-stone

Requires: STONE_CLIENT_SECRET (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only io.github.bajoski34/mcp-flutterwave asks for

  • FLW_SECRET_KEY (secret)

Only io.github.codespar/mcp-stone asks for

  • STONE_CLIENT_SECRET (secret)

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: io.github.bajoski34/mcp-flutterwave · What it can do: io.github.codespar/mcp-stone · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built