Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

io.github.daedalus/mcp-rpcbind vs MOVA MCP Connector

io.github.daedalus/mcp-rpcbind is an MCP server published by daedalus. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). MOVA MCP Connector is an MCP server published by mova-compact. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-05. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceio.github.daedalus/mcp-rpcbindMOVA MCP Connector
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.1.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 58
Downloads/week (PyPI): 18
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

io.github.daedalus/mcp-rpcbind vs MOVA MCP Connector
Factio.github.daedalus/mcp-rpcbindMOVA MCP Connector
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp-rpcbind)On your machine (ghcr.io/mova-compact/mova-mcp-connector:0.1.0)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published5, secrets among them: 2
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/daedalus/mcp-rpcbindgithub.com/mova-compact/mova-mcp-connector
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

io.github.daedalus/mcp-rpcbind

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

MCP server exposing rpcbind/RPC portmapper functionality

MOVA MCP Connector

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Thin MOVA MCP proxy for bindings, transport resolution, and upstream tools/call execution.

How to run each

io.github.daedalus/mcp-rpcbind As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio mcp-rpcbind -- uvx mcp-rpcbind

MOVA MCP Connector

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Requires: MCP_DOOR_ACTOR_ID, MCP_DOOR_GATEWAY_KEY_ID, MCP_DOOR_GATEWAY_SHARED_SECRET (secret), MOVA_ADMIN_READ_TOKEN (secret), MOVA_PLATFORM_URL

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of io.github.daedalus/mcp-rpcbind publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: io.github.daedalus/mcp-rpcbind · What it can do: MOVA MCP Connector · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built