Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Open Markets vs Rba

Open Markets is an MCP server published by danchev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Rba is an MCP server published by pipeworx-io. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-29. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceOpen MarketsRba
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.1.0b1
Downloads/month (PyPI): 755
Downloads/week (PyPI): 164
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 5
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.2.2
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Open Markets vs Rba
FactOpen MarketsRba
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)5 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-17
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (openmarkets)Remote server (gateway.pipeworx.io/rba/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Licence (differs)AGPL-3.0-or-laterNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/danchev/openmarketsgithub.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-rba
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 12 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Open Markets

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Financial market data, SEC filings, macroeconomic telemetry, and portfolio analytics through MCP.

Rba

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

RBA MCP — Reserve Bank of Australia statistics (free, no auth).

How to run each

Open Markets As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio openmarkets -- uvx openmarkets

Rba As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http rba https://gateway.pipeworx.io/rba/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Rba has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither the marketplaces of Open Markets nor its endpoint list any tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Open Markets · What it can do: Rba · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built