Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

GitHub CI/CD MCP Server vs Woodpecker CI

GitHub CI/CD MCP Server is an MCP server published by devstephenke-sys. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Woodpecker CI is an MCP server published by ni-c. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-18. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceGitHub CI/CD MCP ServerWoodpecker CI
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.2.2
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.4.0
Downloads/month (npm): 220
Downloads/week (npm): 45
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

GitHub CI/CD MCP Server vs Woodpecker CI
FactGitHub CI/CD MCP ServerWoodpecker CI
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)2 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-15
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (@kinus/github-cicd-mcp)On your machine (@ni-c/woodpecker-ci-mcp)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)4, secrets among them: 17, secrets among them: 1
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/devstephenke-sys/github-free-mcpsgithub.com/ni-c/woodpecker-ci-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days22
First seen (differs)2026-10-132026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

GitHub CI/CD MCP Server

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

GitHub CI/CD MCP server with 70 tools for repos, PRs, Actions, deployments, billing, and more.

Woodpecker CI

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Read Woodpecker CI repositories, pipelines and logs, and drive builds, secrets and crons

How to run each

GitHub CI/CD MCP Server As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "GITHUB_TOKEN=<YOUR_GITHUB_TOKEN>" --transport stdio github-cicd -- npx -y @kinus/github-cicd-mcp

Requires: GITHUB_TOKEN (secret)

Woodpecker CI As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "WOODPECKER_TOKEN=<YOUR_WOODPECKER_TOKEN>" --env "WOODPECKER_URL=<YOUR_WOODPECKER_URL>" --transport stdio woodpecker-ci-mcp -- npx -y @ni-c/woodpecker-ci-mcp

Requires: WOODPECKER_TOKEN (secret), WOODPECKER_URL

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only GitHub CI/CD MCP Server asks for

  • GITHUB_API_URL
  • GITHUB_GRAPHQL_URL
  • GITHUB_HOST
  • GITHUB_TOKEN (secret)

Only Woodpecker CI asks for

  • WOODPECKER_ALLOW_TOOLS
  • WOODPECKER_API_PREFIX
  • WOODPECKER_DENY_TOOLS
  • WOODPECKER_INSECURE_TLS
  • WOODPECKER_READ_ONLY
  • WOODPECKER_TOKEN (secret)
  • WOODPECKER_URL

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: GitHub CI/CD MCP Server · What it can do: Woodpecker CI · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built