AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server vs CloudBridge
AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server is an MCP server published by elgorro. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, npm registry (MCP servers)). CloudBridge is an MCP server published by cloud-bridge.ru. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-08. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Official MCP Registry | Listed Version: 0.5.3 Downloads/month (npm): 1 601 Downloads/week (npm): 748 Forks (GitHub): 17 Stars (GitHub): 39 Not marked · First seen |
Listed Version: 1.0.0 No figure published Not marked · First seen |
| npm registry (MCP servers) | Listed Version: 0.5.3 Downloads/month (npm): 1 601 Downloads/week (npm): 748 Forks (GitHub): 17 Stars (GitHub): 39 Not marked · First seen |
Not listed |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server | CloudBridge |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it (differs) | 2 (better) | 1 (worse) |
| Stars (GitHub) (differs) | 39 | No figure on GitHub |
| Forks (GitHub) (differs) | 17 | No figure on GitHub |
| Last release (differs) | 2026-11-06 | Not published |
| Where it runs (differs) | On your machine (aiquila-mcp) | Remote server (cloud-bridge.ru/api/mcp) |
| Transport | Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP |
| Tools it declares | Not published | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for (differs) | 3, secrets among them: 1 | Not published |
| Licence (differs) | MIT | Not stated |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/elgorro/aiquila | Not stated |
| Changes in the last 7 days (differs) | 5 | 2 |
| First seen (differs) | 2026-10-11 | 2026-11-03 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | no remote endpoint we check | Responded 28 h ago |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server
Nextcloud MCP server — 349 tools: files, calendar, contacts, mail, Talk, Deck, photos, maps, notes
CloudBridge
Transfer and sync files between 19 cloud storages (Yandex, Google, VK, Telegram, S3)
How to run each
AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server
No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.
Requires: NEXTCLOUD_PASSWORD (secret), NEXTCLOUD_URL, NEXTCLOUD_USER
CloudBridge As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http cloudbridge https://cloud-bridge.ru/api/mcp --header "X-API-Key: <YOUR_CLOUDBRIDGE_API_KEY>"Requires: X-API-Key header
Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Only CloudBridge has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints
Tools each declares
Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.
Settings each asks for
The marketplaces of CloudBridge publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.
What it can do: AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server · What it can do: CloudBridge · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Package data comes from the public npm registry (registry.npmjs.org). Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.