Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

io.github.erliona/tunova vs io.github.library-x/tuney

io.github.erliona/tunova is an MCP server published by erliona. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). io.github.library-x/tuney is an MCP server published by library-x. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-19. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceio.github.erliona/tunovaio.github.library-x/tuney
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.1.1
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

io.github.erliona/tunova vs io.github.library-x/tuney
Factio.github.erliona/tunovaio.github.library-x/tuney
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub)00
Forks (GitHub)00
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (api.tunova.ai/mcp)Remote server (api.tuney.io/cue-engine2/connector/mcp)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/erliona/tunova-sdkgithub.com/library-x/tuney_mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 3 days agoResponded 30 h ago, requires a key

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

io.github.erliona/tunova

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Generate Suno AI music (v5.5) from any MCP client. Async; billed only on success.

io.github.library-x/tuney

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Royalty-free music fitted to your length: find, generate, adjust and download tracks and stems.

How to run each

io.github.erliona/tunova As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http tunova https://api.tunova.ai/mcp --header "X-API-Key: <YOUR_X_API_KEY>"

Requires: X-API-Key header

io.github.library-x/tuney As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http tuney https://api.tuney.io/cue-engine2/connector/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Both endpoints responded at the last daily check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: io.github.erliona/tunova · What it can do: io.github.library-x/tuney · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built