Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Exec Sandbox vs RLM Tools

Exec Sandbox is an MCP server published by inhuman. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). RLM Tools is an MCP server published by stefanoshea. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-20. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceExec SandboxRLM Tools
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.5.4
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 63
Downloads/week (PyPI): 13
Forks (GitHub): 4
Stars (GitHub): 8
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Exec Sandbox vs RLM Tools
FactExec SandboxRLM Tools
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)1 (worse)8 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)4 (better)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (docker.io/idconstruct/mcp-exec:v0.5.4)On your machine (rlm-tools)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)6, secrets among them: 1Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/inhuman/mcp-execgithub.com/stefanoshea/rlm-tools
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Exec Sandbox

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Single exec tool running caller Python in a network-isolated locked-down sandbox.

RLM Tools

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Persistent Python sandbox for token-efficient codebase exploration in MCP clients

How to run each

Exec Sandbox As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "MCP_EXEC_AUTH_TOKEN=<YOUR_MCP_EXEC_AUTH_TOKEN>" --transport stdio mcp-exec -- docker run -i --rm -e MCP_EXEC_AUTH_TOKEN --network none --cap-drop ALL --security-opt no-new-privileges --user 65532:65532 --tmpfs /tmp:rw,noexec,nosuid,size=64m --memory 256m --pids-limit 128 --cpus 1 docker.io/idconstruct/mcp-exec:v0.5.4

Requires: MCP_EXEC_AUTH_TOKEN (secret)

RLM Tools As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio rlm-tools -- uvx rlm-tools

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of RLM Tools publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Exec Sandbox · What it can do: RLM Tools · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built