Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

io.github.joegra2003/metamodel vs BioMASS ODE Model Builder

io.github.joegra2003/metamodel is an MCP server published by joegra2003. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). BioMASS ODE Model Builder is an MCP server published by marcorusc. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-21. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceio.github.joegra2003/metamodelBioMASS ODE Model Builder
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.2.0
Downloads/month (npm): 125
Downloads/week (npm): 11
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 2.5.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 1 519
Downloads/week (PyPI): 97
Forks (GitHub): 6
Stars (GitHub): 20
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

io.github.joegra2003/metamodel vs BioMASS ODE Model Builder
Factio.github.joegra2003/metamodelBioMASS ODE Model Builder
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)20 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)6 (better)
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-21
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (www.metamodel.app/api/mcp)On your machine (mcp-biomodelling-servers)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/metamodel-app/mcp-servergithub.com/marcorusc/mcp-biomodelling-servers
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)08
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 3 days agono remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

io.github.joegra2003/metamodel

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

AI-callable calculators and engineering models with real formulas. No hallucinated math.

BioMASS ODE Model Builder

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Construct, inspect, visualize, and simulate evidence-backed ODE models with BioMASS

How to run each

io.github.joegra2003/metamodel As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http metamodel https://www.metamodel.app/api/mcp

BioMASS ODE Model Builder As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio biomass -- uvx --from mcp-biomodelling-servers==2.5.0 mcp-biomass-server mcp-biomodelling-servers

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only io.github.joegra2003/metamodel has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: io.github.joegra2003/metamodel · What it can do: BioMASS ODE Model Builder · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built