Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Performance Co-Pilot vs ESXi Read-Only Diagnostics

Performance Co-Pilot is an MCP server published by major. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). ESXi Read-Only Diagnostics is an MCP server published by nicolasboattini. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-27. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplacePerformance Co-PilotESXi Read-Only Diagnostics
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.5.1
Downloads/month (PyPI): 185
Downloads/week (PyPI): 53
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.1
Downloads/month (PyPI): 249
Downloads/week (PyPI): 31
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Performance Co-Pilot vs ESXi Read-Only Diagnostics
FactPerformance Co-PilotESXi Read-Only Diagnostics
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub)00
Forks (GitHub)00
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (pcp-mcp)On your machine (esxi-readonly-mcp)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)3, secrets among them: 05, secrets among them: 1
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/major/pcp-mcpgithub.com/nicolasboattini/esxi-readonly-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Performance Co-Pilot

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Query system performance metrics via MCP - CPU, memory, disk I/O, network, processes

ESXi Read-Only Diagnostics

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Read-only VMware ESXi diagnostics: CPU Ready, disk latency, snapshots, real space, hardware health.

How to run each

Performance Co-Pilot As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio pcp -- uvx pcp-mcp

ESXi Read-Only Diagnostics As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "ESXI_HOST=<YOUR_ESXI_HOST>" --env "ESXI_PASSWORD=<YOUR_ESXI_PASSWORD>" --env "ESXI_USER=<YOUR_ESXI_USER>" --transport stdio esxi-readonly-mcp -- uvx esxi-readonly-mcp

Requires: ESXI_HOST, ESXI_PASSWORD (secret), ESXI_USER

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only Performance Co-Pilot asks for

  • PCP_HOST
  • PCP_PORT
  • PCP_TARGET_HOST

Only ESXi Read-Only Diagnostics asks for

  • ESXI_HOST
  • ESXI_PASSWORD (secret)
  • ESXI_PORT
  • ESXI_USER
  • ESXI_VERIFY_SSL

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: Performance Co-Pilot · What it can do: ESXi Read-Only Diagnostics · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built