Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

OpenScout vs Trustabl

OpenScout is an MCP server published by oscout. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, Community GitHub marketplaces). Trustabl is an MCP server published by trustabl. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, Community GitHub marketplaces). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-15. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceOpenScoutTrustabl
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.2.108
Downloads/month (npm): 4 644
Downloads/week (npm): 1 197
Forks (GitHub): 3
Stars (GitHub): 10
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.12
Forks (GitHub): 64
Stars (GitHub): 73
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

OpenScout vs Trustabl
FactOpenScoutTrustabl
Marketplaces that list it22
Stars (GitHub) (differs)10 (worse)73 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)3 (worse)64 (better)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (@openscout/scout)On your machine (ghcr.io/trustabl/agent-reliability-analyzer:0.1.12)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Hooks it runs (differs)Not published1
Parts of the bundle (differs)15
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Repository (differs)github.com/oscout/scoutgithub.com/trustabl/agent-reliability-analyzer
Changes in the last 7 days22
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

OpenScout

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Coordinate local coding agents and track handoffs. For high-trust developer pilots.

Trustabl

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Find and fix reliability and safety gaps in agent code, across nine agent SDKs.

How to run each

OpenScout As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio scout -- npx -y @openscout/scout mcp

Trustabl As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio agent-reliability-analyzer -- docker run -i --rm -v "<YOUR_SOURCE_PATH>:/workspace:ro" ghcr.io/trustabl/agent-reliability-analyzer:0.1.12 mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: OpenScout · What it can do: Trustabl · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built