Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Bindingdb vs NeoSQL MCP

Bindingdb is an MCP server published by pipeworx-io. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). NeoSQL MCP is an MCP server published by unvus. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, npm registry (MCP servers)). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-28. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceBindingdbNeoSQL MCP
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.1.3
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.8.11
Downloads/month (npm): 2 661
Downloads/week (npm): 291
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen
npm registry (MCP servers) Not listed Listed
Version: 1.8.11
Downloads/month (npm): 2 661
Downloads/week (npm): 291
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Bindingdb vs NeoSQL MCP
FactBindingdbNeoSQL MCP
Marketplaces that list it (differs)1 (worse)2 (better)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)1 (better)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last release (differs)2026-10-23Not published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (gateway.pipeworx.io/bindingdb/mcp)On your machine (neosql-mcp)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Licence (differs)Not statedApache-2.0
Repository (differs)github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-bindingdbgithub.com/unvus/neosql-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)10
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 3 days agono remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Bindingdb

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

BindingDB — measured protein/small-molecule binding affinities.

NeoSQL MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Schemas, SQL, ERDs, and codegen for PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, SQLite, and more via NeoSQL Desktop.

How to run each

Bindingdb As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http bindingdb https://gateway.pipeworx.io/bindingdb/mcp

NeoSQL MCP As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio neosql-mcp -- npx -y neosql-mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Bindingdb has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither the marketplaces of NeoSQL MCP nor its endpoint list any tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Bindingdb · What it can do: NeoSQL MCP · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Package data comes from the public npm registry (registry.npmjs.org). Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built