Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Revternal vs io.github.swerve-hoe/ozma

Revternal is an MCP server published by pipeworx-io. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). io.github.swerve-hoe/ozma is an MCP server published by swerve-hoe. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-07. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceRevternalio.github.swerve-hoe/ozma
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.3.1
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Revternal vs io.github.swerve-hoe/ozma
FactRevternalio.github.swerve-hoe/ozma
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Last release (differs)2026-11-04Not published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (gateway.pipeworx.io/revternal/mcp)Remote server (mcp.ozma.app/mcp)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 1Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-revternalgithub.com/swerve-hoe/ozma
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)10
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded less than an hour agoNo HTTP response at the last check (15 h ago)

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Revternal

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Revternal MCP — wraps Revternal's people/developer intelligence API (api.revternal.com), rebuilt…

io.github.swerve-hoe/ozma

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Agentic API marketplace — search, provision, and call data sources with one Ozma key

How to run each

Revternal As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http revternal https://gateway.pipeworx.io/revternal/mcp

Requires: PIPEWORX_API_KEY (secret)

io.github.swerve-hoe/ozma As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http ozma https://mcp.ozma.app/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only the endpoint of Revternal responded at the last daily check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither the marketplaces of io.github.swerve-hoe/ozma nor its endpoint list any tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of io.github.swerve-hoe/ozma publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Revternal · What it can do: io.github.swerve-hoe/ozma · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built