ZettelForge vs Lattice: CVE, MITRE ATT&CK and detection graph for security agents
ZettelForge is an MCP server published by rolandpg. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Lattice: CVE, MITRE ATT&CK and detection graph for security agents is an MCP server published by namiq.io. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-30. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  ZettelForge |  Lattice: CVE, MITRE ATT&CK and detection graph for security agents |
|---|---|---|
| Official MCP Registry | Listed Version: 2.4.0 Downloads/month (PyPI): 91 Downloads/week (PyPI): 32 Forks (GitHub): 9 Stars (GitHub): 66 Not marked · First seen |
Listed Version: 0.2.1 No figure published Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | ZettelForge | Lattice: CVE, MITRE ATT&CK and detection graph for security agents |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it | 1 | 1 |
| Stars (GitHub) (differs) | 66 | No figure on GitHub |
| Forks (GitHub) (differs) | 9 | No figure on GitHub |
| Last release | Not published | Not published |
| Where it runs (differs) | On your machine (zettelforge) | Remote server (lattice.namiq.io/mcp) |
| Transport (differs) | stdio | Streamable HTTP |
| Tools it declares | Not published | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for | Not published | Not published |
| Licence | Not stated | Not stated |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/rolandpg/zettelforge | Not stated |
| Changes in the last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First seen | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-11 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | no remote endpoint we check | Responded 3 days ago |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
ZettelForge
Agentic memory for cyber threat intelligence. STIX graphs, actor aliasing, offline RAG, Sigma/YARA.
Lattice: CVE, MITRE ATT&CK and detection graph for security agents
CVE, KEV, MITRE ATT&CK, CWE and detection graph for AI agents; every link names its source.
How to run each
ZettelForge As a local MCP server: PyPI package
claude mcp add --transport stdio zettelforge -- uvx zettelforgeLattice: CVE, MITRE ATT&CK and detection graph for security agents As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http lattice https://lattice.namiq.io/mcp --header "X-API-Key: <YOUR_X_API_KEY>"Requires: X-API-Key header
Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Only Lattice: CVE, MITRE ATT&CK and detection graph for security agents has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints
Tools each declares
Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.
Settings each asks for
Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.
What it can do: ZettelForge · What it can do: Lattice: CVE, MITRE ATT&CK and detection graph for security agents · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.