Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Stellar Memory vs DualSPHysics MCP

Stellar Memory is an MCP server published by sangjun0000. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). DualSPHysics MCP is an MCP server published by vegetableno1. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-22. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceStellar MemoryDualSPHysics MCP
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.0.3
Downloads/month (npm): 311
Downloads/week (npm): 94
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.2.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 437
Downloads/week (PyPI): 32
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Stellar Memory vs DualSPHysics MCP
FactStellar MemoryDualSPHysics MCP
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub1
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (stellar-memory)On your machine (dualsphysics-mcp)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)4, secrets among them: 06, secrets among them: 0
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/vegetableno1/dualsphysics-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Stellar Memory

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Persistent AI memory using orbital mechanics. 100% local, zero API keys, MCP-native.

DualSPHysics MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Agent toolchain for the DualSPHysics SPH solver: case creation, runs, post-processing, validation.

How to run each

Stellar Memory As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio stellar-memory -- npx -y stellar-memory

DualSPHysics MCP As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio dualsphysics -- uvx dualsphysics-mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only Stellar Memory asks for

  • STELLAR_API_PORT
  • STELLAR_DB_PATH
  • STELLAR_PROJECT
  • STELLAR_SUN_TOKEN_BUDGET

Only DualSPHysics MCP asks for

  • DSPH_GENCASE
  • DSPH_JOBS_DIR
  • DSPH_MEASURETOOL
  • DSPH_OMP_THREADS
  • DSPH_PARTVTK
  • DSPH_SOLVER

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: Stellar Memory · What it can do: DualSPHysics MCP · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built