Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

QueryBear vs Apache Pinot MCP Server

QueryBear is an MCP server published by spencerpauly. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Apache Pinot MCP Server is an MCP server published by startreedata. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, PyPI (MCP servers)). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-27. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceQueryBearApache Pinot MCP Server
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 5.0.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 178
Downloads/week (PyPI): 119
Forks (GitHub): 13
Stars (GitHub): 17
Not marked · First seen
PyPI (MCP servers) Not listed Listed
Version: 5.0.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 178
Downloads/week (PyPI): 119
Forks (GitHub): 13
Stars (GitHub): 17
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

QueryBear vs Apache Pinot MCP Server
FactQueryBearApache Pinot MCP Server
Marketplaces that list it (differs)1 (worse)2 (better)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub17
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub13
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-12
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (mcp.querybear.com/mcp)On your machine (mcp-pinot-server)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published8, secrets among them: 2
Licence (differs)Not statedApache-2.0
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/startreedata/mcp-pinot
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 1 h ago, requires a keyno remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

QueryBear

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Safe, read-only Postgres and MySQL access for AI agents. Audit log + column-level controls.

Apache Pinot MCP Server

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Query and manage Apache Pinot through MCP with typed tools and preview-first safety.

How to run each

QueryBear As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http querybear https://mcp.querybear.com/mcp

Apache Pinot MCP Server As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "PINOT_PASSWORD=<YOUR_PINOT_PASSWORD>" --env "PINOT_TOKEN=<YOUR_PINOT_TOKEN>" --transport stdio mcp-pinot -- uvx mcp-pinot-server

Requires: PINOT_PASSWORD (secret), PINOT_TOKEN (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only QueryBear has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of QueryBear publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: QueryBear · What it can do: Apache Pinot MCP Server · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built