Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

QueryBear vs io.github.txn2/mcp-trino

QueryBear is an MCP server published by spencerpauly. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). io.github.txn2/mcp-trino is an MCP server published by txn2. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-23. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceQueryBeario.github.txn2/mcp-trino
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.2.1
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 5
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

QueryBear vs io.github.txn2/mcp-trino
FactQueryBeario.github.txn2/mcp-trino
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub5
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub1
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (mcp.querybear.com/mcp)On your machine (https://github.com/txn2/mcp-trino/releases/download/v0.2.1/mcp-trino_0.2.1_darwin_arm64.mcpb)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/txn2/mcp-trino
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 3 days ago, requires a keyno remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

QueryBear

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Safe, read-only Postgres and MySQL access for AI agents. Audit log + column-level controls.

io.github.txn2/mcp-trino

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

MCP server for Trino data warehouses. Query, analyze plans, and explore schemas.

How to run each

QueryBear As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http querybear https://mcp.querybear.com/mcp

io.github.txn2/mcp-trino

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only QueryBear has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: QueryBear · What it can do: io.github.txn2/mcp-trino · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built