Alternatives to Global Journal Club

Comparable listings

1. Galio Research Describes nearly the same job, smaller audience · Narrower access than the original 3 users (last published figure) Compare side by side
2. Academia Co-Scientist Describes nearly the same job, smaller audience · Wider access than the original 300 users ★ 5.0 Compare side by side
3. LitFlo Describes nearly the same job, smaller audience · Narrower access than the original 6 users Compare side by side
4. hubscience-client-qa Describes nearly the same job, smaller audience · Narrower access than the original 8 users ★ 5.0 Compare side by side
5. Paperedge Describes nearly the same job, smaller audience · Narrower access than the original 15 users ★ 5.0 Compare side by side
6. Research Connect Describes nearly the same job, smaller audience · Narrower access than the original 6 users ★ 5.0 Compare side by side
7. JRNLClub Describes nearly the same job, smaller audience · Narrower access than the original 13 users ★ 5.0 Compare side by side
8. NextPaper Describes nearly the same job, smaller audience · Narrower access than the original 5 users Compare side by side

Comparable listings are pre-computed from the meaning of each store listing, then shown with the audience and rating from our latest pass over the store. Access compares where each listing can run (every site, how many site patterns) and how many browser permissions it declares, against the extension it would replace. Narrower is not a verdict on safety: compare what each needs for the job.