fakeloc — Random Address & Autofill vs Profilerator
fakeloc — Random Address & Autofill has 1 user and Profilerator has 16 users, as of our catalog pass of 2026-10-30. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
The facts side by side
| Fact | fakeloc — Random Address & Autofill | Profilerator |
|---|---|---|
| Users (differs) | 1 (worse) | 16 (better) |
| Users, last 30 days (differs) | Not watched long enough to say | Unchanged |
| Rating | not rated yet | not rated yet |
| Number of ratings | 0 | 0 |
| Category | Productivity · Developer | Productivity · Developer |
| Publisher (differs) | tibo | unknown |
| Site access | No site access | No permissions at all |
| Browser permissions (differs) | 4 browser permissions | no browser permissions |
| Data collection (differs) | 2 kinds of data declared | Declares it collects none |
| Versions in the last 90 days | none | none |
| Version (differs) | 1.2.0 | 2.0.0 |
| Updated in the store (differs) | 2026-10-28 (better) | 2025-11-11 (worse) |
| Published (differs) | 2026-10-28 | 2024-12-31 |
| Manifest | V3 | V3 |
| Featured badge | No | No |
| Established publisher badge | No | No |
| Privacy policy | Yes | Yes |
| Declared trader | No | No |
| Download size (differs) | 1.0 MiB | 74 KiB |
| Languages | 1 language | 1 language |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more users, faster growth over 30 days, a higher rating, more ratings, a fresher update, more new versions, more languages, a store badge, a privacy policy), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Permissions, site access, declared data, size and time in the store are marked only as different: fewer or more is not better in itself.
fakeloc — Random Address & Autofill
1 user
- 2026-10-290appeared in the store
- 2026-10-301
- Last updated in the store 2 days ago, on 2026-10-28.
- No new version in the last 90 days.
Profilerator
16 users
- 2026-08-318
- 2026-09-069
- 2026-09-0811
- 2026-09-0910
- 2026-09-1311
- 2026-09-1512
- 2026-09-1710
- 2026-09-2014
- 2026-09-2516
- 2026-09-2717
- 2026-09-2816
- 2026-10-0515
- 2026-10-0816
- 2026-10-1014
- 2026-10-1315
- 2026-10-1613
- 2026-10-1712
- 2026-10-1814
- 2026-10-2116
- 2026-10-2215
- 2026-10-2314
- 2026-10-2416
- 2026-10-2515
- 2026-10-2916
- 2026-10-3016
- Last updated in the store 353 days ago, on 2025-11-11.
- No new version in the last 90 days.
What one asks for and the other does not
fakeloc — Random Address & Autofill: No site access. Profilerator: No permissions at all.
Only fakeloc — Random Address & Autofill
-
Run its own code on the pages it can access
scripting -
Act on the current tab, but only after you click it
activeTab -
Add items to the right-click menu
contextMenus -
Store data in your browser
storage
Only Profilerator
No browser permission the other one lacks.
Declared reach only. Asking for less is not a verdict on safety: compare what each needs for the job.
What data each declares
fakeloc — Random Address & Autofill: The developer declares that it collects these kinds of data: Web history, Website content.
Profilerator: The developer declares that it does not collect or use your data.
Declared by fakeloc — Random Address & Autofill and not by Profilerator: Web history, Website content.
This is each developer's own declaration in the Chrome Web Store. We cannot check it against what the extension does.
Who is updated more often
Neither has shipped a new version in the last 90 days.
Figures come from the public Chrome Web Store, which our own crawler reads up to 2 times a day. We do not install or audit extensions and publish no contact details for their developers. Catalog pass of .
Is it safe: fakeloc — Random Address & Autofill · Is it safe: Profilerator · Alternatives to fakeloc — Random Address & Autofill · Compare two other extensions
Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built