Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Firecrawl vs x402 Tools

Firecrawl is an MCP server published by firecrawl. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). x402 Tools is an MCP server published by foxxx009. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-19. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceFirecrawlx402 Tools
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:28e677a10704
Forks (GitHub): 927
Pulls (Docker Hub): 140 281
Stars (Docker Hub): 20
Stars (GitHub): 7 637
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.1.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Firecrawl vs x402 Tools
FactFirecrawlx402 Tools
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)7 637 (better)0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)140 281No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)927 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/firecrawl)Remote server (fitze-x402-seller.app.workbuddy.host/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)26Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)8, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/mendableai/firecrawl-mcp-servergithub.com/foxxx009/x402-tools-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 3 days ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Firecrawl

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

🔥 Official Firecrawl MCP Server - Adds powerful web scraping and search to Cursor, Claude and any other LLM clients.

x402 Tools

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Pay-per-call research tools for AI agents, paid via x402 USDC. Remote MCP, one free tool.

How to run each

Firecrawl As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "FIRECRAWL_API_KEY=<YOUR_FIRECRAWL_API_KEY>" --transport stdio firecrawl -- docker run -i --rm -e FIRECRAWL_API_KEY mcp/firecrawl

Requires: FIRECRAWL_API_KEY (secret)

x402 Tools As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http x402-tools-mcp https://fitze-x402-seller.app.workbuddy.host/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only x402 Tools has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of x402 Tools publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of x402 Tools publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Firecrawl · What it can do: x402 Tools · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built