Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

skim vs Scholar Feed

skim is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Shubhashis Roy Dipta. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). Scholar Feed is an MCP server published by YGao2005. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, Community GitHub marketplaces). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-23. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceskimScholar Feed
Community marketplace dipta007/skim Listed
Version: 0.5.1
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 13
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 3.20.0
Downloads/month (npm): 490
Downloads/week (npm): 39
Forks (GitHub): 4
Stars (GitHub): 13
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

skim vs Scholar Feed
FactskimScholar Feed
Marketplaces that list it (differs)1 (worse)2 (better)
Stars (GitHub)1313
Forks (GitHub) (differs)1 (worse)4 (better)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleRemote server or your machine
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published1, secrets among them: 1
Parts of the bundle (differs)21
LicenceMITMIT
Repository (differs)github.com/dipta007/skimgithub.com/ygao2005/scholar-feed-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen (differs)2026-10-162026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 5 days ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

skim

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

Summarize arxiv papers as plain-language stories or deep technical dives

Scholar Feed

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Rank CS/AI/ML papers by citations, forecast impact, or code adoption; trace 23.2M citation edges.

How to run each

skim As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add dipta007/skim
/plugin install skim@skim

Scholar Feed As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add ygao2005/scholar-feed-mcp
/plugin install scholar-feed@scholar-feed

Requires: SF_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Scholar Feed has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of skim publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: skim · What it can do: Scholar Feed · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built