Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Permissions and history

Is ReClip safe to install?

ReClip asks for 1 browser permission and 2 site patterns. We do not audit code and we do not judge intent; what we can show is what the listing declares and whether that has changed while we have been watching.

ReClip

Chrome extension by coah · Productivity · Tools

Open in the Chrome Web Store
What the developer says, and 1 screenshot

Loading from the Chrome Web Store. Open the listing if it does not appear.

At a glance

Facts, not a score: an ad blocker needs every page and a theme needs nothing, so one number would be wrong about both. Each fact links to its detail.

Site access
Access to specific sites only
Data collection
Declares it collects none
Publisher
No store badges
Audience
325 users · 4.4/5

What data it declares

The developer declares that it does not collect or use your data.

The developer also certifies that your data is not sold to third parties outside approved uses, not used for purposes unrelated to the extension's core function, and not used to decide creditworthiness or lending.

The listing links to a privacy policy.

This is the developer's own declaration in the Chrome Web Store. We cannot check it against what the extension does.

What Chrome asks you to allow

When you add it, Chrome asks you to allow it to:

Derived from the manifest by Chrome's documented rules; the dialog's exact wording depends on your Chrome version and language. Chrome asks again if an update requests more.

What it can reach

Specific sites only: 2 match patterns.

Routine for an extension

Pages it runs its code on

It runs its own code on specific pages only: 2 site patterns.

A content script is code the extension injects into pages matching these patterns. On those pages it can read and change what you see, whether or not a host permission is listed above.

How usual this is for its category

In Productivity · Tools, 20% of extensions ask for access to every site. This one: Access to specific sites only.

The typical extension there declares 3 browser permissions; this one declares 1 browser permission.

Counted over the live extensions of the same category after our latest full pass of the store. A share is context, not a verdict: what is normal depends on what the extension is for.

Who uses it and how it is kept up

325 users

Users
+101 since 31.08
224-360 · 44 readings
2026-11-02: released 1.1.0
  1. 2026-08-31224
  2. 2026-09-02239
  3. 2026-09-04261
  4. 2026-09-05258
  5. 2026-09-06260
  6. 2026-09-08246
  7. 2026-09-10239
  8. 2026-09-13242
  9. 2026-09-15250
  10. 2026-09-16252
  11. 2026-09-21260
  12. 2026-09-22266
  13. 2026-09-25265
  14. 2026-09-27268
  15. 2026-09-28264
  16. 2026-10-05277
  17. 2026-10-08287
  18. 2026-10-09297
  19. 2026-10-10304
  20. 2026-10-11305
  21. 2026-10-13311
  22. 2026-10-16320
  23. 2026-10-17317
  24. 2026-10-18322
  25. 2026-10-20330
  26. 2026-10-21334
  27. 2026-10-22347
  28. 2026-10-23349
  29. 2026-10-24353
  30. 2026-10-25359
  31. 2026-10-26359
  32. 2026-10-28360
  33. 2026-10-29354
  34. 2026-10-30347
  35. 2026-11-01327
  36. 2026-11-02325released 1.1.0
  37. 2026-11-04321
  38. 2026-11-06319
  39. 2026-11-07319
  40. 2026-11-08325
  41. 2026-11-09329
  42. 2026-11-10326
  43. 2026-11-11325
  44. 2026-11-13325

What the store shows

The store shows none of its badges on this listing. Most listings carry none.

Has it asked for more over time?

This is the question a permission list on its own cannot answer. An extension that shipped narrow and widened later is a different proposition from one that always asked for the same thing.

The permissions this extension requests have not changed since we started watching it.

Versions we have seen

  1. Version 1.1.0

Who publishes it

coah, who publishes 2 listings we track. This listing has been in the store since 2026-04-27 and was last updated on 2026-11-02.

Similar extensions that ask for less

Listings close to this one in what they say they do, which declare less reach. Less reach is not a verdict on either: compare what each needs for the job.

  1. Katto: clip YouTube videos No site access · 1 permission 21 users
  2. Youtube Share Clip No site access · 1 permission 2k users ★ 3.7
  3. video-clipper No site access · 3 permissions 225 users ★ 1.0

How to check or remove it in Chrome

  1. Type chrome://extensions in the address bar and find the extension in the list.
  2. Open its details. The site access setting shows where it can run; set it to run only on click and it reaches a page only after you press its icon.
  3. To uninstall it, choose Remove on the same page.

Questions people ask

What can ReClip access?
Specific sites only: 2 match patterns. It declares 1 browser permission.
What data does ReClip collect?
The developer declares that it does not collect or use your data. This is the developer's own declaration in the Chrome Web Store. We cannot check it against what the extension does.
Has ReClip asked for more permissions over time?
The permissions this extension requests have not changed since we started watching it.
Does ReClip publish a privacy policy?
Yes, the store listing links to a privacy policy.

We read the public store listing up to 2 times a day and keep what it declared. We do not install the extension, do not audit its code, do not judge its intent and publish no contact details for its developer. Last read on 2026-11-13.

Back to ReClip · Alternatives to ReClip

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built