Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

GitLab (Archived) vs FeatQ

GitLab (Archived) is an MCP server published by modelcontextprotocol. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). FeatQ is an MCP server published by featq.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-08. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceGitLab (Archived)FeatQ
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:a1b8571a210a
Forks (GitHub): 11 931
Pulls (Docker Hub): 84 528
Stars (Docker Hub): 25
Stars (GitHub): 91 873
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.1
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

GitLab (Archived) vs FeatQ
FactGitLab (Archived)FeatQ
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)91 873No figure on GitHub
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)84 528No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)11 931No figure on GitHub
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-21
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/gitlab)Remote server (featq.com/api/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)9Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)NOASSERTIONNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/modelcontextprotocol/serversNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-19
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkStatus out of date: last check 2 days ago returned HTTP 401

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

GitLab (Archived)

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

MCP Server for the GitLab API, enabling project management, file operations, and more.

FeatQ

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Feature-request board for software teams: users vote, your coding agent pulls top requests over MCP

How to run each

GitLab (Archived) As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "GITLAB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN=<YOUR_GITLAB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN>" --transport stdio gitlab -- docker run -i --rm -e GITLAB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN mcp/gitlab

Requires: GITLAB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN (secret)

FeatQ As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http featq https://featq.com/api/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only FeatQ has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of FeatQ publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of FeatQ publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: GitLab (Archived) · What it can do: FeatQ · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built