Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Hyperbrowser vs bunwv

Hyperbrowser is an MCP server published by hyperbrowserai. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). bunwv is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Charles Squeri. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-08. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceHyperbrowserbunwv
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:11ed80138c33
Forks (GitHub): 75
Pulls (Docker Hub): 43 495
Stars (Docker Hub): 3
Stars (GitHub): 793
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Community marketplace naticha/bunwv Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.2
Forks (GitHub): 7
Stars (GitHub): 219
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Hyperbrowser vs bunwv
FactHyperbrowserbunwv
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)793 (better)219 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)43 495No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)75 (better)7 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/hyperbrowser)Installs as a plugin bundle
Transport (differs)stdioNot stated
Tools it declares (differs)10Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 1Not published
Parts of the bundle (differs)Not a bundle1
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/hyperbrowserai/mcpgithub.com/naticha/bunwv
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-30

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Hyperbrowser

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

A MCP server implementation for hyperbrowser.

bunwv

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

Headless browser automation CLI skill for Bun.WebView testing and UI interaction

How to run each

Hyperbrowser As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "HYPERBROWSER_API_KEY=<YOUR_HYPERBROWSER_API_KEY>" --transport stdio hyperbrowser -- docker run -i --rm -e HYPERBROWSER_API_KEY mcp/hyperbrowser

Requires: HYPERBROWSER_API_KEY (secret)

bunwv As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add naticha/bunwv
/plugin install bunwv@bunwv

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of bunwv publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of bunwv publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Hyperbrowser · What it can do: bunwv · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built