Okta vs JotOak
Okta is an MCP server published by okta. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Docker MCP Catalog, PyPI (MCP servers)). JotOak is an MCP server published by iyuyoung. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-11. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  Okta |  JotOak |
|---|---|---|
| Docker MCP Catalog | Listed Version: sha256:f8330e18913b Forks (GitHub): 69 Pulls (Docker Hub): 7 664 Stars (Docker Hub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 77 Not marked · First seen |
Not listed |
| PyPI (MCP servers) | Listed Version: 1.1.7 Downloads/month (PyPI): 4 000 Downloads/week (PyPI): 958 Forks (GitHub): 69 Stars (GitHub): 77 Not marked · First seen |
Not listed |
| Official MCP Registry | Not listed | Listed Version: 0.1.0 No figure published Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | Okta | JotOak |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it (differs) | 2 (better) | 1 (worse) |
| Stars (GitHub) (differs) | 77 | No figure on GitHub |
| Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs) | 7 664 | No figure on Docker Hub |
| Forks (GitHub) (differs) | 69 | No figure on GitHub |
| Last release | Not published | Not published |
| Where it runs (differs) | On your machine (mcp/okta-mcp-server) | Remote server (jotoak.com/mcp) |
| Transport (differs) | stdio | Streamable HTTP |
| Tools it declares (differs) | 108 | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for (differs) | 7, secrets among them: 1 | Not published |
| Licence (differs) | Apache-2.0 | Not stated |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/okta/okta-mcp-server | Not stated |
| Changes in the last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First seen (differs) | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-15 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | no remote endpoint we check | Status out of date: last check 32 h ago returned HTTP 405 |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
Okta
## :tada: __It's Official__ :tada: The Okta Open-Source MCP Server integrates with LLMs and AI agents, allowing you to perform various Okta management operations using natural language and is Generally Available (GA).
JotOak
Find published word searches, crosswords and mazes with matching Letter and A4 PDF files.
How to run each
Okta As a local MCP server: Docker image
claude mcp add --env "OKTA_PRIVATE_KEY=<YOUR_OKTA_PRIVATE_KEY>" --transport stdio okta-mcp-server -- docker run -i --rm -e OKTA_PRIVATE_KEY mcp/okta-mcp-serverRequires: OKTA_PRIVATE_KEY (secret)
JotOak As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http jotoak https://jotoak.com/mcpCommands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Only JotOak has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints
Tools each declares
The marketplaces of JotOak publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.
Settings each asks for
The marketplaces of JotOak publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.
What it can do: Okta · What it can do: JotOak · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.