Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

feature-dev vs Go Spec Reviewer

feature-dev is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Anthropic. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Claude Code: claude-plugins-official, Community GitHub marketplaces). Go Spec Reviewer is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Steve Francia. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-10. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacefeature-devGo Spec Reviewer
Claude Code: claude-plugins-official Listed
Version: 1.0.1
Forks (GitHub): 4 858
Stars (GitHub): 46 630
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Community marketplace spf13/go-skills Not listed Listed
Version: 1.1.0
Forks (GitHub): 38
Stars (GitHub): 698
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

feature-dev vs Go Spec Reviewer
Factfeature-devGo Spec Reviewer
Marketplaces that list it (differs)2 (better)1 (worse)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)46 630 (better)698 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)4 858 (better)38 (worse)
Last release (differs)2026-10-28Not published
Where it runsInstalls as a plugin bundleInstalls as a plugin bundle
TransportNot statedNot stated
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Parts of the bundle (differs)4Not published
Licence (differs)Not statedMIT
Repository (differs)github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-officialgithub.com/spf13/go-skills
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-11-06

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

feature-dev

In its own words, on Claude Code: claude-plugins-official:

Comprehensive feature development workflow with specialized agents for codebase exploration, architecture design, and quality review

Go Spec Reviewer

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

Review Go design documents before implementation begins — catches over-engineering, missing error paths, interface misuse, and Cobra/Viper convention violations while a plan is still cheap to change.

How to run each

feature-dev As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin install feature-dev@claude-plugins-official

Go Spec Reviewer As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add spf13/go-skills
/plugin install go-spec-reviewer@go-skills

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: feature-dev · What it can do: Go Spec Reviewer · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-official/blob/HEAD/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built