Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

dot-mcp vs Harny Action Record

dot-mcp is an MCP server published by Ashveil1. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (PyPI (MCP servers)). Harny Action Record is an MCP server published by harny.ai. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-12. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacedot-mcpHarny Action Record
PyPI (MCP servers) Listed
Version: 0.2.3
Downloads/month (PyPI): 0
Downloads/week (PyPI): 639
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

dot-mcp vs Harny Action Record
Factdot-mcpHarny Action Record
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)2 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (dot-mcp)Remote server (mcp.harny.ai/record)
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/ashveil1/dot-mcpgithub.com/harny-ai/skills
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen (differs)2026-10-122026-11-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 21 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

dot-mcp

In its own words, on PyPI (MCP servers):

Personal MCP agent: shell, files, memory, goals, inbox, scheduler, capability URL + self-hosted OAuth

Harny Action Record

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

A record of every action your agent takes for each person: what, for whom, when, with what result.

How to run each

dot-mcp

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Harny Action Record As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http action-record https://mcp.harny.ai/record --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Harny Action Record has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: dot-mcp · What it can do: Harny Action Record · Compare two other plugins

Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built