Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

mcp-memory-service vs 2Mind

mcp-memory-service is an MCP server published by doobidoo. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (PyPI (MCP servers)). 2Mind is an MCP server published by use2mind.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-14. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacemcp-memory-service2Mind
PyPI (MCP servers) Listed
Version: 12.9.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 8 649
Downloads/week (PyPI): 1 459
Forks (GitHub): 416
Stars (GitHub): 2 127
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

mcp-memory-service vs 2Mind
Factmcp-memory-service2Mind
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)2 127No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)416No figure on GitHub
Last release (differs)2026-11-13Not published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp-memory-service)Remote server (api.use2mind.com/mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)github.com/doobidoo/mcp-memory-serviceNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)20
First seen (differs)2026-10-122026-11-05
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkNo HTTP response at the last check (5 h ago)

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

mcp-memory-service

In its own words, on PyPI (MCP servers):

Semantic memory layer for AI applications. REST API + MCP transport + knowledge graph + autonomous consolidation. Works with 14+ AI clients. Self-host, zero cloud cost.

2Mind

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Personal AI memory: search and read your notes and todos; changes wait for your approval.

How to run each

mcp-memory-service

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

2Mind As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http 2mind https://api.use2mind.com/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only 2Mind has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: mcp-memory-service · What it can do: 2Mind · Compare two other plugins

Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built