Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

mcp-logseq vs Append Log MCP

mcp-logseq is an MCP server published by ergut. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (PyPI (MCP servers)). Append Log MCP is an MCP server published by bobbyhouse. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-10. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacemcp-logseqAppend Log MCP
PyPI (MCP servers) Listed
Version: 1.10.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 1 891
Downloads/week (PyPI): 152
Forks (GitHub): 51
Stars (GitHub): 350
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

mcp-logseq vs Append Log MCP
Factmcp-logseqAppend Log MCP
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)350No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)51No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp-logseq)On your machine (roberthouse224/append-log-mcp:1.0.0)
Transport (differs)Not statedstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published2, secrets among them: 0
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/ergut/mcp-logseqNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen (differs)2026-10-122026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

mcp-logseq

In its own words, on PyPI (MCP servers):

MCP server to work with LogSeq via the local HTTP server

Append Log MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

A generic append-only log MCP server. Persist timestamped JSON entries and query them by recency.

How to run each

mcp-logseq

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Append Log MCP As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "APPEND_LOG_TOOLS=<YOUR_APPEND_LOG_TOOLS>" --transport stdio append-log-mcp -- docker run -i --rm -e APPEND_LOG_TOOLS run append-log-data:/data roberthouse224/append-log-mcp:1.0.0

Requires: APPEND_LOG_TOOLS

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of mcp-logseq publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: mcp-logseq · What it can do: Append Log MCP · Compare two other plugins

Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built