Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

google-flow-mcp vs gflow-cli

google-flow-mcp is an MCP server published by joshuadaniel-8090. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (PyPI (MCP servers)). gflow-cli is an MCP server published by ffroliva. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-11. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacegoogle-flow-mcpgflow-cli
PyPI (MCP servers) Listed
Version: 0.1.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 171
Downloads/week (PyPI): 106
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.97.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 6 947
Downloads/week (PyPI): 1 707
Forks (GitHub): 106
Stars (GitHub): 377
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

google-flow-mcp vs gflow-cli
Factgoogle-flow-mcpgflow-cli
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub377
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub106
Last release (differs)Not published2026-11-10
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (google-flow-mcp)On your machine (gflow-cli)
Transport (differs)Not statedstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published1, secrets among them: 0
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)github.com/joshuadaniel-8090/google-flow-mcpgithub.com/ffroliva/gflow-cli
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)06
First seen (differs)2026-10-122026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

google-flow-mcp

In its own words, on PyPI (MCP servers):

MCP server giving Claude Desktop access to Google AI image and video generation

gflow-cli

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Drive Google Flow from an agent: Veo video and Imagen image generation

How to run each

google-flow-mcp

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

gflow-cli As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio gflow-cli -- uvx gflow-cli mcp run

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of google-flow-mcp publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: google-flow-mcp · What it can do: gflow-cli · Compare two other plugins

Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built