roost-mcp vs Reclaim Protocol Builder
roost-mcp is an MCP server published by roostcapital. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (PyPI (MCP servers)). Reclaim Protocol Builder is an MCP server published by reclaimprotocol. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, npm registry (MCP servers)). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-11. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  roost-mcp |  Reclaim Protocol Builder |
|---|---|---|
| PyPI (MCP servers) | Listed Version: 0.2.2 Downloads/month (PyPI): 0 Downloads/week (PyPI): 537 Not marked · First seen |
Not listed |
| Official MCP Registry | Not listed | Listed Version: 0.1.46 No figure published Not marked · First seen |
| npm registry (MCP servers) | Not listed | Listed Version: 0.1.45 Downloads/month (npm): 2 243 Downloads/week (npm): 1 516 Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | roost-mcp | Reclaim Protocol Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it (differs) | 1 (worse) | 2 (better) |
| Last release (differs) | 2026-11-02 (worse) | 2026-11-10 (better) |
| Where it runs (differs) | On your machine (roost-mcp) | On your machine (@reclaimprotocol/agent) |
| Transport (differs) | Not stated | stdio |
| Tools it declares | Not published | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for | Not published | Not published |
| Licence (differs) | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/roostcapital/roost | github.com/reclaimprotocol/developer-tools |
| Changes in the last 7 days (differs) | 0 | 6 |
| First seen (differs) | 2026-10-13 | 2026-10-12 |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
roost-mcp
Model Context Protocol server for Roost — credit underwriting and per-spend decisioning for AI agents.
Reclaim Protocol Builder
Integrate source-account verification into products. Find, build, test, and maintain providers.
How to run each
roost-mcp
No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.
Reclaim Protocol Builder As a local MCP server: npm package
claude mcp add --transport stdio builder -- npx -y @reclaimprotocol/agentCommands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Tools each declares
Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.
Settings each asks for
Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.
What it can do: roost-mcp · What it can do: Reclaim Protocol Builder · Compare two other plugins
Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Package data comes from the public npm registry (registry.npmjs.org). Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.