Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

snodo-mcp vs Lulu Registry MCP

snodo-mcp is an MCP server published by snodo-dev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (PyPI (MCP servers)). Lulu Registry MCP is an MCP server published by Lulu-The-Narwhal. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-08. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacesnodo-mcpLulu Registry MCP
PyPI (MCP servers) Listed
Version: 0.28.3
Downloads/month (PyPI): 2 587
Downloads/week (PyPI): 323
Forks (GitHub): 3
Stars (GitHub): 7
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

snodo-mcp vs Lulu Registry MCP
Factsnodo-mcpLulu Registry MCP
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)7No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)3No figure on GitHub
Last release (differs)2026-11-05Not published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (snodo-mcp)Remote server (ads.getlulu.dev/registry/mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)github.com/snodo-dev/snodogithub.com/lulu-the-narwhal/lulu-platform
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)20
First seen (differs)2026-10-132026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkAnswered with HTTP 502 (13 h ago)

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

snodo-mcp

In its own words, on PyPI (MCP servers):

Snodo MCP — MCP servers, planning, recon, and jobs

Lulu Registry MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Search and get install details on MCP servers, right from your agent -- a unified marketplace index.

How to run each

snodo-mcp

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Lulu Registry MCP As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http registry-mcp https://ads.getlulu.dev/registry/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Lulu Registry MCP has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: snodo-mcp · What it can do: Lulu Registry MCP · Compare two other plugins

Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built