Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

mcpsignals vs PostHog MCP Server

mcpsignals is an MCP server published by zentered-studios. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (PyPI (MCP servers)). PostHog MCP Server is an MCP server published by PostHog. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-10. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplacemcpsignalsPostHog MCP Server
PyPI (MCP servers) Listed
Version: 2.5.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 562
Downloads/week (PyPI): 194
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 3
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.1
Forks (GitHub): 3 609
Stars (GitHub): 40 711
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

mcpsignals vs PostHog MCP Server
FactmcpsignalsPostHog MCP Server
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)3 (worse)40 711 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)3 609 (better)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcpsignals)Remote server (mcp.posthog.com/mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/zentered-studios/mcpsignalsgithub.com/posthog/posthog
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen (differs)2026-10-122026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 17 h ago, requires authentication

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

mcpsignals

In its own words, on PyPI (MCP servers):

Drop-in instrumentation for MCP servers. Writes tool-call events to a database you own.

PostHog MCP Server

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Official PostHog MCP Server for product analytics, feature flags, experiments, and more.

How to run each

mcpsignals

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

PostHog MCP Server As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http posthog-mcp-server https://mcp.posthog.com/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_API_KEY>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only PostHog MCP Server has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: mcpsignals · What it can do: PostHog MCP Server · Compare two other plugins

Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built