Ausca vs FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices
Ausca is an MCP server published by ausca.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices is an MCP server published by fitmycall.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-11. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  Ausca |  FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices |
|---|---|---|
| Official MCP Registry | Listed Version: 1.2.6 Downloads/month (npm): 723 Downloads/week (npm): 325 Forks (GitHub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 38 Not marked · First seen |
Listed Version: 1.0.0 No figure published Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | Ausca | FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it | 1 | 1 |
| Stars (GitHub) (differs) | 38 | No figure on GitHub |
| Forks (GitHub) (differs) | 0 | No figure on GitHub |
| Last release | Not published | Not published |
| Where it runs (differs) | Remote server (ausca.com/mcp) | Remote server (mcp.fitmycall.com/mcp) |
| Transport | Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP |
| Tools it declares | Not published | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for (differs) | 2, secrets among them: 1 | Not published |
| Licence | Not stated | Not stated |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/auscahq/ausca | Not stated |
| Changes in the last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First seen | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-11 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | Responded 18 h ago | Responded 11 h ago |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
Ausca
Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.
FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices
Verified pricing for 21 answering services & AI receptionists, dated weekly. Missed-call ROI calc.
How to run each
Ausca As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http agent-services https://ausca.com/mcpRequires: AUSCA_PRIVATE_KEY (secret)
FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http pricing https://mcp.fitmycall.com/mcpCommands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Both endpoints responded at the last daily check. How we check endpoints
Tools each declares
Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.
Settings each asks for
The marketplaces of FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.
What it can do: Ausca · What it can do: FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.