Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

com.mcparmory/contentful-management vs vibecms

com.mcparmory/contentful-management is an MCP server published by mcparmory.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). vibecms is an MCP server published by vibecms.dev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-09. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacecom.mcparmory/contentful-managementvibecms
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.0.3
Downloads/month (PyPI): 795
Downloads/week (PyPI): 151
Forks (GitHub): 4
Stars (GitHub): 32
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.2.0
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

com.mcparmory/contentful-management vs vibecms
Factcom.mcparmory/contentful-managementvibecms
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)32 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)4 (better)1 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcparmory-contentful-management)Remote server (app.vibecms.dev/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/mcparmory/registrygithub.com/moinulmoin/vibecms
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-11-01
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 26 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

com.mcparmory/contentful-management

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Create, update, and publish content across spaces and environments

vibecms

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

A blog CMS that AI agents write into over MCP: Markdown drafts, versions, media, human approval.

How to run each

com.mcparmory/contentful-management As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio contentful-management -- uvx mcparmory-contentful-management

vibecms As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http vibecms https://app.vibecms.dev/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only vibecms has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: com.mcparmory/contentful-management · What it can do: vibecms · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built