e-conomic by Cotlet vs Kingdee K3Cloud (Cloud Galaxy) ERP
e-conomic by Cotlet is an MCP server published by cotlet.dev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Kingdee K3Cloud (Cloud Galaxy) ERP is an MCP server published by WaHaiLong. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, PyPI (MCP servers)). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-09. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  e-conomic by Cotlet |  Kingdee K3Cloud (Cloud Galaxy) ERP |
|---|---|---|
| Official MCP Registry | Listed Version: 1.0.0 No figure published Not marked · First seen |
Listed Version: 0.2.4 Downloads/month (PyPI): 762 Downloads/week (PyPI): 831 Forks (GitHub): 47 Stars (GitHub): 137 Not marked · First seen |
| PyPI (MCP servers) | Not listed | Listed Version: 0.2.4 Downloads/month (PyPI): 762 Downloads/week (PyPI): 831 Forks (GitHub): 47 Stars (GitHub): 137 Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | e-conomic by Cotlet | Kingdee K3Cloud (Cloud Galaxy) ERP |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it (differs) | 1 (worse) | 2 (better) |
| Stars (GitHub) (differs) | No figure on GitHub | 137 |
| Forks (GitHub) (differs) | No figure on GitHub | 47 |
| Last release (differs) | Not published | 2026-10-25 |
| Where it runs (differs) | Remote server (cotlet.dev/mcp/v1/e-conomic/connect) | On your machine (kingdee-mcp) |
| Transport (differs) | Streamable HTTP | stdio |
| Tools it declares | Not published | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for (differs) | Not published | 4, secrets among them: 1 |
| Licence (differs) | Not stated | MIT |
| Repository (differs) | Not stated | github.com/wahailong/kingdeemcp |
| Changes in the last 7 days (differs) | 2 | 0 |
| First seen (differs) | 2026-11-09 | 2026-10-12 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | not checked yet | no remote endpoint we check |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
e-conomic by Cotlet
Invoices, customers and entries in e-conomic.
Kingdee K3Cloud (Cloud Galaxy) ERP
Third-party open-source MCP server for Kingdee K3Cloud ERP - 101 tools, 17 domains. Unofficial.
How to run each
e-conomic by Cotlet As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http e-conomic https://cotlet.dev/mcp/v1/e-conomic/connectKingdee K3Cloud (Cloud Galaxy) ERP As a local MCP server: PyPI package
claude mcp add --env "KINGDEE_ACCT_ID=<YOUR_KINGDEE_ACCT_ID>" --env "KINGDEE_PASSWORD=<YOUR_KINGDEE_PASSWORD>" --env "KINGDEE_SERVER_URL=<YOUR_KINGDEE_SERVER_URL>" --env "KINGDEE_USERNAME=<YOUR_KINGDEE_USERNAME>" --transport stdio kingdee-mcp -- uvx kingdee-mcpRequires: KINGDEE_ACCT_ID, KINGDEE_PASSWORD (secret), KINGDEE_SERVER_URL, KINGDEE_USERNAME
Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Tools each declares
Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.
Settings each asks for
The marketplaces of e-conomic by Cotlet publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.
What it can do: e-conomic by Cotlet · What it can do: Kingdee K3Cloud (Cloud Galaxy) ERP · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.